Wednesday, 25 June 2014

Global Insurance Company

Global Insurance Company
Source(google.com.pk)
FM Global is a Johnston, Rhode Island-based mutual insurance company, with offices worldwide, that specializes in loss prevention services primarily to large corporations throughout the world in the Highly Protected Risk (HPR) property insurance market sector. "FM Global" is the communicative name of the company, whereas the legal name is "Factory Mutual Insurance Company". FM Global has been named the "Best Property Insurer in the World” by Euromoney Magazine [1]

The company employs a non-traditional[2] business model whereby risk and premiums are determined by engineering analysis as opposed to historically based actuarial calculations. This business approach is centered on the belief that property losses can be prevented or mitigated. FM Global engineering personnel regularly visit insured locations to evaluate hazards and recommend improvements to their property or work practices to reduce physical and financial risks if a loss occurs.[3]

History
During the depression of 1835, Zachariah Allen, a prominent textile mill owner, attempted to reduce the insurance premium on his Rhode Island, USA, mill by making property improvements that he believed would minimize the damage in case of fire. At that time, insurance premium increases for losses were shared among all insureds, regardless of individual loss history. The concept of loss prevention and control was virtually unheard of at the time. To Allen, a proactive approach to preventing losses made good economic sense.

After making considerable improvements to his mill, Allen requested a reduction in his premium, but was denied. He called upon other local textile mill owners who shared his loss prevention philosophy to create a mutual insurance company that would only insure factories with lower risks. This approach should result in fewer losses and smaller premium payments. Whatever premium remained at the end of the year would be returned to policyholders in the form of dividends. The group agreed, and by year's end, formed the Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance Company, the oldest predecessor of FM Global.

During the company's first 14 years, the mill owners and mutual policyholders of Manufacturers Mutual enjoyed an average 50-percent reduction in premium compared with what other insurance companies were charging. The fire prevention methods they developed, monitored by regular fire inspections for mill policyholders, resulted in fewer losses. Despite its initial success, one problem remained for the pioneer mutual insurance company: a single mutual insurance company could not withstand the financial cost of the loss of an entire plant. More insurance capacity was needed, so in 1848, Allen formed another mutual insurance company, Rhode Island Mutual.

Expansion
In 1850, Boston Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance Company, the third-oldest FM Global predecessor, was created when Allen convinced a Boston merchant with significant cotton-mill ownership to form his own mutual insurance company with like-minded Boston mill owners. Throughout the next 20 years, other mutual insurance companies were added to the group roster. Together, these companies and the ones that later evolved soon became known as the Associated Factory Mutual Fire Insurance Companies, or the Factory Mutuals, for short.

Loss information helped identify specific industry hazards and was used in developing loss control recommendations for policyholders in similar industries. Such information was shared among all the Factory Mutual (FM) insurance companies, and was utilized by the inspection teams. As the FM companies grew, however, the inspection workload became difficult to manage. By 1878, the FM companies formed a dedicated unit to handle the collective inspection activities for all the FM policyholders. This unique group of loss control specialists initially provided only inspection services. The group later began performing appraisals and adjustments, loss analysis and research activities associated with preventing fire and other hazards in order to benefit the mutual insurance company owners and their policyholders. Today, all of these services remain components to FM Global in the form of engineering and research.

The FM companies' main interests in the late 19th century and early 20th century remained focused on researching and developing products or techniques that would help mitigate property risks and advance the efforts of property conservation. In 1874, a revolutionary form of loss control entered the loss prevention scene: the fire sprinkler. While the invention was originally designed outside the realm of FM, FM's further development and promotion of the sprinkler head aided in its eventual widespread use and acceptance.[citation needed]

The 20th Century
The beginning of the 20th century brought significant change to the FM companies. Where once the mutual insurance companies focused primarily on the familiar business of textiles primarily within the Northeast region of the US, new companies began to form that sought business beyond the traditional geographical boundaries. These mutuals began branching out into other industries, such as shoe and rubber manufacturers, foundries and light, gas and power companies, while still maintaining their preference for low-risk properties.

During the next 75 to 80 years, the need for more comprehensive policyholder coverage grew, forcing a series of consolidations among the FM companies. By 1987, 42 separate mutual insurance companies had become three: Allendale Mutual Insurance Company, Johnston, R.I., USA; Arkwright-Boston Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, Waltham, Mass., USA; and Protection Mutual Insurance Company, Park Ridge, Ill., USA. The three separate organizations found it difficult to deliver competitively priced, value-added engineering services in a marketplace full of increasing competition and a demand for more challenging property protection programs. The three companies were sharing the resources of an inspection group, yet were competing with one another for customers. To reduce competition and costs, in 1998 the CEOs announced their intent to merge the three companies to create FM Global. The merger was completed in 1999.

FM Global Today
FM Global is an international property insurance and loss prevention engineering company with US$5.6 billion of in-force premium (FY2013), US$9.7 billion in policyholders' surplus (FY2013), with clients in more than 100 countries and 4400 employees.[4]

FM Global awarded its largest ever membership credit in 2013 of US$435 million, intended to allow clients to share in the benefits of their risk improvement efforts, totalling nearly US$2.1 billion in total premium reduction via membership credits since 2001. [5]

Research Campus and FM Approvals
FM Global’s 1,600 acre (648 ha) Research Campus[6] in West Glocester, R.I., USA, conducts testing in fire and explosion hazards, hazards detection and protection technology, natural disasters (flooding, wind damage, etc.), electrical hazards, and automatic sprinkler hydraulics. These tests range from witnessing the difference in how products burn to how construction components perform in hurricane conditions.

In 2004, FM Global entered into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with Sandia National Laboratory (US)[2] The CRADA will develop advanced diagnostics and modeling of catastrophic fires.

Monday, 16 June 2014

Health Care Insurance Companies In Pakistan

Health Care Insurance Companies In Pakistan
Source(google.com.pk)

Allianz EFU Health Insurance Company Limited

Alpha Insurance Company Limited

Amercian Life Insurance Company Limited

Asia Insurance Company Limited

Asian Mutual Insurance Company Limited (No Website)

Askari General Insurance Company Limited

Beema Insurance Company Limited

Business & Industrial Insurance Company Ltd.

Capital Insurance Company Limited

Central Insurance Company Limited

Century Insurance Company Limited

Commercial Union Life Assurance Company

Co-operative Insurance Society of Pakistan Limited

Credit Insurance Company Limited

Crescent Star Insurance Company Limited

Dadabhoy Insurance Company Limited

Delta Insurance Company Limited

E.F.U.General Insurance Company Limited

E.F.U.Life Insurance Company Limited

East West Insurance Company Limited

Excel Insurance Company Limited

Gulf Insurance Company Limited

Habib Insurance Company Limited

Indus International Insurance Company Limited

International General Insurance Co. of Pakistan

Ittefaq General Insurance Company Limited

Jupiter Insurance Company Limited

Metropoliton Life Assurance Company Limited

Muslim Insurance Company Limited (Now Atlas Insurance)

National General Insurance Company Limited

New Jubilee Insurance Company Limited

North Star Insurance Company Limited

Orient Insurance Company Limited

Pakistan General Insurance Company Limited

Pakistan Guarantee Insurance Company Limited

Pakistan Mutual Insurance Company Limited

Platinum Insurance Company Limited

Premier Insurance Company Limited

Prime Insurance Company Limited

Raja Insurance Company Limited

Reliance Insurance Company Limited

Seafield Insurance Company Limited

Security General Insurance Company Limited

Shaheen Insurance Company Limited

Sliver Star Insurance Company Limited

Union Insurance Company of Pakistan Limited

United Insurance Company of Pakistan Limited

Universal Insurance Company Limited



Wednesday, 11 June 2014

State Life Insurance Corporation Of Pakistan

State Life Insurance Corporation Of Pakistan

Save your money for your precious future the main theme of this "aj bachaye kal kam aye ga". So come soon to save your life

___________How ?___________
Join us our state life group
Contact me: 03362174016
Name: Ms Masooma (Branch officer)

Address:
 Room #4 state life building #7, 
Ground floor, G.Allana road,
 near Nakhuda masjid, Tower Karachi. 











Tuesday, 27 August 2013

Department Insurance California

Source(google.com.pk)
Department Insurance California Information
More insurers in the state and country will be required to participate in a climate change survey that helps state insurance departments identify trends and vulnerabilities.
California Department of Insurance 
Commissioner Dave Jones announced that he has doubled the survey scope in the Golden State by requiring all insurance companies writing more than $100 million in direct written premium to respond to the survey.
Jones also announced that the insurance departments in Connecticut and Minnesota have joined California, Washington and New York in requiring insurers to participate in the Climate Risk Survey, which the National Association of Insurance Commissioners adopted in 2009.
With more insurers participating, insurance regulators, investors and policyholders can get “a better picture of how insurers are responding to climate change,” Jones said in a news release.
Past surveys have indicated that Fireman’s Fund is a leader in California in responding to climate change, the release said. The insurer offers “green” insurance products designed for LEED-certified commercial properties. Fireman’s Fund policies and products also recognize homeowners who replace their homes with energy-efficient materials and appliances.
The survey asks insurers about such things as carbon footprint reduction plans and risk management for a changing environment, the release said.

Project Summary: 
The California Department of Insurance (CDI) regulates indemnity health plans in California, as well as many PPOs and other insurance plans. CDI also regulates auto, homeowners, and other insurance lines, as well as brokers and agents.

HRA worked with CDI to rewrite, update, and redesign five informational booklets. HRA used health literacy best practices to improve readability and usability. The booklets covered the topics of health insurance, auto insurance, earthquake insurance, safer driving for seniors, and annuities for seniors.

HRA worked with CDI to reduce and explain insurance jargon and address common consumer questions and concerns, such as annuity scams aimed at seniors. Each booklet includes resources; for example, the booklet on health insurance includes information on health care reform and phone numbers to call to file a grievance or appeal.
Consumers Guide to Health Insurance
Auto Insurance
Earthquake Insurance
Safer Driving for Seniors
Annuities: What Seniors Need to Know




Why is this important?

For years, transgender Californians have been denied access to health coverage due to discriminatory exclusions in health plans. Even after passage of the Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act in 2005, insurance companies persisted in limiting care based on an individual’s transgender status. Regulators are finally saying this is no longer permissible.

The DMHC letter directs health plans to remove benefit and coverage exclusions related to gender transition as well as limitations based on gender identity or gender expression. This development should ensure parity in coverage, and significantly increase medically necessary services available to transgender people.

The new Director’s Letter also allows transgender people to access DMHC’s Independent Medical Review (IMR) process if a health plan denies a specific medical service or treatment. Before the Director’s Letter, transition-related care was classified as a coverage exclusion and was ineligible for the independent medical review.

Who will this impact?

22.5 million Californians are enrolled in health plans regulated by DMHC. Until the Director’s letter was released on April 9, 2013, the majority of individual, small group, and large employer health care insurance plans regulated by DMHC had blanket exclusions restricting coverage for transgender people. Those exclusions will no longer be permitted and must be removed. Effective immediately, transgender patients have access to the Independent Medical Review (IMR) process if a medically necessary claim is denied by their carrier.





Calif Dept Insurance

Source(google.com.pk)
Calif Dept Insurance Information
The California Department of Insurance (CDI) ensures that consumers are protected; that the insurance marketplace is fostered to be vibrant and stable; that the regulatory process is maintained as open and equitable;and that the law is enforced fairly and impartially. 

Consumer Services 

Consumer Communications Bureau (Hotline) 
The Department's statewide toll-free consumer Hotline, 800-927-HELP (4357), provides callers with immediate access to current information on insurance issues. 213-897-8921 (Outside California), 800-482-4833 (TDD) 

Consumer Inquiries and Assistance 

Requests for Assistance 
After listening to and discussing a consumer's concerns over the phone, a Hotline officer may decide to send the consumer a Request for Assistance (RFA) form to be completed and returned to the Department. The RFA provides the necessary information to open a complaint investigation, which will be handled by officers in the Claims Services Bureau or the Rating and Underwriting Services Bureau, depending on the subject matter involved. Within 10 working days the consumer will receive an acknowledgment from the officer who will be handling the file. 

Educating Consumers 
Along with assisting consumers with specific insurance concerns, the Department publishes free brochures to help consumers become aware of their rights and to aid them in making informed insurance decisions. These publications can be requested by calling toll-free 800-927-HELP (4357).
Specialties
Consumer Services, Requests for Assistance, Educating Consumers, Regulatory Authority and Enforcement







Wednesday, 31 July 2013

Insurance Company Names Information

Source(google.com.pk)
Insurance Company Names Information
If you're involved in an accident, "The first thing to do is let your insurance company know you were in an accident and provide all the specifics of it," Salvatore says. "From the second of the accident, keep good records." Use your smartphone (or keep a notebook in your glovebox) and write down the time, date, plate number, make and model of their car, their registration information, license number, name, insurance company and contact information.
gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot
please read this article our blog  please read this article our blog please read this article our blog
If the police are on the scene, Salvatore says, take their names and badge numbers. Get the names of any witnesses and note whether emergency medical personnel were called. "Photos are helpful. Take pictures of the car and the license plate," she says. "If the claim is straightforward, you may not need any of it, but if a problem occurs, you need all the information possible." Again, with the prevalence of smartphones these days, this is all quite easy to do.
From filing the claim to resolving it, every insurance company's methods are different. However, the essentials of the process are fairly standard. You'll only see part of the process, though. All negotiations between insurance companies about payments and reimbursements will be carried on behind the scenes.
gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot
please read this article our blog  please read this article our blog please read this article our blog
Filing Your Claim
As with Cutler's case, it's standard for your insurance carrier to call soon after you report an accident. During that call, "We'll match the person to their policy, determine what happened in the accident, find out about any injuries, the extent of damage to both vehicles and get some demographic information," says Mike Flato, a process business leader for Progressive Insurance. "We'll make sure everyone is OK; if not, what happened and then who'll handle the medical claims."
gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot
please read this article our blog  please read this article our blog please read this article our blog
After a claim is filed, your insurance company assigns you a claims adjustor, who is your contact from then on. Adjustors coordinate teams that look at medical reports, investigate the accident, speak with witnesses, view the scene, examine the vehicle damage, manage all the repairs and any medical treatments, check all coverages (how much your policy pays for medical injuries and property damages) and ultimately determine fault.
"The claims process is the business of the insurance company," says Salvatore. "Every situation is different, and the better organized you are, the easier the claims process is."
While adjustors work, medical treatment and auto repairs start immediately, with each insurance company covering its own driver's injuries and property damages. This process of "making you whole" is known as indemnification. Your insurance company indemnifies you, not the other way around. Later, after the insurance companies assess fault, they will negotiate to determine which one will reimburse the other for claims paid.
gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot gindaralankablogspot
please read this article our blog  please read this article our blog please read this article our blog A former Vancouver insurance agent has been charged with theft and forgery for allegedly collecting about $15,000 in commissions by creating fictitious applicants for insurance policies.
Julie Anne Goss, 43, an independent agent for AFLAC, was arraigned last week in Clark County Superior Court.
The scam came to light after the owner of a restaurant in Battle Ground, Wash. told AFLAC that she’d received premium bills for two “employees” that had never worked there.
AFLAC investigated, and it turned out that Goss wrote dozens of policies for 15 people that either weren’t employees at the named businesses or apparently didn’t exist. In other cases, she wrote policies for real employees, but they said they hadn't applied for the coverage.
In each case, Goss stood to get a commission for the policy. All told, the investigator found, between August 2010 and January 2011, Goss wrote 91 fraudulent insurance policies and collected more than $15,000 in commissions for them.
The company canceled its contract with Goss in March 2011 and reported the matter to our Special Investigations Unit. After investigating further, we revoked Goss’ insurance license in January 2012. The charges against her were filed in late June.
If you suspect insurance fraud and you live in Washington state, please report it.The church insurance business is a game, a contest between the church and the insurer. You'd like to think you're working together, but let's be serious. The insurer wants to collect as much premium as possible from you while paying the least amount in claims, and the church is trying to pay the least amount in premium while getting the big problems paid by the insurer. It's a competition.

In any fair game both sides know and understand all of the rules, but that's not true of the church insurance game. The insurers know the rules, but the churches only know what the insurer or their experience has told them about the rules. It's sort of like playing poker and only one guy knows that two pair beats two aces, so when you show your pairs of 2's and 3's, he tells you his pair of aces wins and if you don't know better, you give him all your chips.

This website is designed to help even the playing field a bit by giving churches more knowledge of the rules of the game so they can compete evenly with, or perhaps even gain an advantage over, the insurance companies. I won't be discussing specific coverage at this site - that's a discussion you should have with your agent.

The most important post on this site is "What Your Churches Insurance Agent Doesn't Want You to Know". I've detailed many of the rules of the game in that post and it's a must-read for any church preparing to negotiate their insurance deal. There is also an audio version of this information which you can listen to my clicking on the player in the right-hand sidebar. Your church insurance agent won't like it, but nobody likes to lose an advantageous negotiating position.

I'm also going to use this site for two other purposes. I'm going to tell you some stories from my church insurance days, some funny, some irritating, but all true. Some of the things happened to me, and some I heard from others. I won't give you the names of the companies I worked for, the name of the agency or the people I worked with, nor will I mention the names of the church clients and prospects I worked with. There's no sense in poking the bear more than I have to.

I'm also going to talk about people management, or more correctly, how not to manage people. During my years in the church insurance business I was witness to and victim of some of the poorest people management skills I've ever seen in a person who was not the homicidal dictator of some banana republic. Think Hugo Chavez with a Lexus. That's why I describe myself as a "recovering church insurance agent". Whether you work in insurance or any other field involving people, these stories will be instructive.

This post will stay at the top of the page. New posts will appear beneath it.

Related Tags: Church Insurance, Church Mutual Insurance, GuideOne Insurance, Brotherhood Insurance, Philadelphia Insurance, Church Mutual, GuideOne, Insurance For Religious Organizations, Insurance For Churches, Church Insurance Programs, Church Insurance Agent
POSTED BY RICK MOORE AT 1:31 PM
LABELS: BROTHERHOOD INSURANCE, CHURCH INSURANCE, CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE, GUIDEONE INSURANCE, INSURANCE FOR CHURCHES, PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE A popular insurance text starts with, “The growth of federal and state legislation dealing with employment discrimination and sexual harassment, the changing legal views on wrongful termination, and the increasing tendency of aggrieved parties to turn to the courts for settlement of such disputes have caused insurers to specifically exclude coverage for such employment-related claims in the commercial general liability policy.”
To fill this gap, a number of insurers are offering employment practices liability (EPL) coverage as an endorsement to the commercial general liability policy or as a stand-alone policy. Independently developed by each company, the EPL coverage forms vary by company, however, most policies are similar in terms and conditions.

EPL policies are usually written on a claims-made basis, which means that for a claim to be covered, it must occur during the policy term. Extended reporting periods from one to three years can be added for an additional premium.

In addition to damages paid for judgments or settlements, the cost of defense is covered. However, it is usually paid from the limit of liability, not in addition to the limit of liability. Most EPL policies specifically cover back pay. Back pay is commonly awarded to successful claimants in discrimination and wrongful termination actions.

Typically, the definition of “insured” in an EPL policy includes the corporation, its directors and officers, its employees, and, in most policies, its former employees. Some policies limit the definition of “insured” to include only managerial employees.

The deductible for this coverage ranges from $1,000 to $250,000, depending on underwriting factors. One difference from other types of policies is that the EPL policy usually requires the insured to participate in losses exceeding the deductible. The amount that the insured contributes after the deductible has been satisfied is based on the “participation rate.” Participation rates are usually 5 to 10 percent, but can reach as high as 25 percent depending on underwriting factors.
There are a number of things to be aware of if you are already considering the purchase of a Medigap insurance including the following:

• Even if you have health problems, you can renew your Medigap policy so as long as you pay your premiums on time, you cannot be cancelled.
• Individuals can purchase insurance from any insurance carrier in their state provided that company is licensed by the state in question.
• Individuals who are covered by a Medicare Advantage Plan must cancel their policies before Medigap goes into effect. You can not have both.
• It does not cover things like long-term care and dental insurance.
• Medigap policies that were purchased after January 1st, 2006 do not cover prescription drugs. If you need this coverage, sign up for Medicare Part D.
• Only one person can be covered by a Medigap policy.
• Policy holders must have Part A and B Medicare coverage.
• You have to pay your Medigap premium in addition to your Part B coverage.

Make sure that you take these into consideration when you start shopping for your Medigap supplement coverage.

Who Benefits From Medigap Supplement Insurance?

The US Government worked with private insurance carriers in order to develop Medigap supplement insurance, especially for disabled individuals and the elderly in order to provide them with comprehensive health care that is administered by the government. The key benefit is that Medigap helps individuals pay for those additional costs that Medicare does not cover such as co-insurances, deductibles, and premiums.

Some services may also be covered, depending on the needs of the policy holder. In addition to this, coverage is oftentimes provided (where applicable) during deductible periods. Most importantly, and depending on the Medigap supplement insurance that the consumer opts for, there may be additional benefits that are not covered by traditional Medicare insurance even though Medicare will continue to pay for approved health care costs.
 




Health Insurance Policy Information

Source(Google.com.pk)
Health Insurance Policy Information
When I moved to Canada in 2008, I was a die-hard conservative Republican. So when I found out that we were going to be covered by Canada’s Universal Health Care, I was somewhat disgusted. This meant we couldn’t choose our own health coverage, or even opt out if we wanted too. It also meant that abortion was covered by our taxes, something I had always believed was horrible. I believed based on my politics that government mandated health care was a violation of my freedom.
When I got pregnant shortly after moving, I was apprehensive. Would I even be able to have a home birth like I had experienced with my first 2 babies? Universal Health Care meant less choice right? So I would be forced to do whatever the medical system dictated regardless of my feelings, because of the government mandate. I even talked some of having my baby across the border in the US, where I could pay out of pocket for whatever birth I wanted. So imagine my surprise when I discovered that Midwives were not only covered by the Universal health care, they were encouraged! Even for hospital births. In Canada, Midwives and Dr’s were both respected, and often worked together.
I went to my first Midwife appointment and sat in the waiting room looking at the wall of informational pamphlets. I never went to the Dr growing up, we didn’t have health insurance, and my parents preferred a conservative naturopathic doctor anyways. And the doctor I had used for my first 2 births was also a conservative Christian. So I had never seen information on birth control and STDs. One of the pamphlets read “Pregnant Unexpectedly?” so I picked it up, wondering what it would say. The pamphlet talked about adoption, parenthood, or abortion. It went through the basics of what each option would entail and ended by saying that these choices were up to you. I was horrified that they included abortion on the list of options, and fact that the pamphlet was so balanced instead of “pro-life.”
During my appointment that day, the midwife asked her initial round of questions including whether or not I had desired to become pregnant in the first place. Looking back I am not surprised she asked that, I was depressed at the time, (even though I did not list that on my medical chart) and very vocal about my views on birth control (it wasn’t OK, ever.) No wonder she felt like she should ask if I was happy to be having this baby. But I was angry about the whole thing. In my mind, freedom was being violated, my rights were being decided for me by the evils of Universal Health Care.
Fast forward a little past the Canadian births of my third and fourth babies. I had better prenatal care than I had ever had in the States. I came in regularly for appointments to check on my health and my babies’ health throughout my pregnancy, and I never had to worry about how much a test cost or how much the blood draw fee was. I didn’t have to skip my ultrasound because of the expense. With my pregnancies in the States, I had limited my checkups to only a handful to keep costs down. When I went in to get the shot I needed because of my negative blood type, in Canada it was covered. In fact I got the recommended 2 doses instead of the more risky 1 dose because I didn’t have to worry about the expense. I had a wide array of options and flexibility when it came to my birth, and care providers that were more concerned with my health and the health of my baby than how much money they might make based on my birth, or what might impact their reputation best. When health care is universal, doctors are free to recommend and provide the best care for every patient instead of basing their care on what each patient can afford.
I found out that religious rights were still respected. The Catholic hospital in the area did not provide abortions, and they were not required too. I had an amazing medically safe birth, and excellent post-natal care with midwives who had to be trained, certified and approved by the medical system.
I started to feel differently about Universal government mandated and regulated Health care. I realized how many times my family had avoided hospital care because of our lack of coverage. When I mentioned to Canadians that I had been in a car accident as a teen and hadn’t gone into the hospital, they were shocked! Here, you always went to the hospital, just in case. And the back pain I had endured ever since would have been investigated and cared for with whatever X-rays, Physiotherapy or even Surgery that was needed, which would have been at no cost to me. In our particular province, even chiropractic care was provided after a car accident by the provincial care insurance.When I asked for prayers for my little brother who had been burned in an accident, they were all puzzled why the story did not include immediately rushing him to the hospital. When they asked me to clarify and I explained that many people in the States are not insured and they try to put off medical care unless absolutely needed, they literally could not comprehend such a thing.I started to wonder why I had been so opposed to government mandated Universal Health care. Almost every western country in the world has Universal Insurance of some kind, except the USA. Here in Canada, everyone was covered. If they worked full-time, if they worked part-time, or if they were homeless and lived on the street, they were all entitled to the same level of care if they had a medical need. People actually went in for routine check-ups and caught many of their illnesses early, before they were too advanced to treat. People were free to quit a job they hated, or even start their own business without fear of losing their medical coverage. In fact, the only real complaint I heard about the Universal Health Care from the Canadians themselves, was that sometimes there could be a wait time before a particular medical service could be provided. But even that didn’t seem to be that bad to me, in the States most people had to wait for medical care, or even be denied based on their coverage. Depending on where one lived and how rural the area was, one’s access to care could be limited, and that was regardless of what country one lived in. The only people guaranteed immediate and full service in the USA, were those with the best (and most expensive) health coverage or wads of cash they could blow. In Canada, the wait times were usually short, and applied to everyone regardless of wealth. If you were discontent with the wait time (and had the money to cover it) you could always travel out of the country to someplace where you could demand a particular service for a price. Personally, I never experienced excessive wait times, I was accepted for maternity care within a few days or weeks, I was able to find a family care provider nearby easily and quickly, and when a child needed to be brought in for a health concern I was always able to get an appointment within that week.
The only concern I was left with was the fact that abortion was covered by the Universal Health Care, and I still believed that was wrong. But as I lived there, I began to discover I had been misled in that understanding as well. Abortion wasn’t pushed as the only option by virtue of it being covered. It was just one of the options, same as it was in the USA. In fact, the percentage rates of abortion are far lower in Canada than they are in the USA, where abortion is often not covered by insurance and can be much harder to get. In 2008 Canada had an abortion rate of 15.2 per 1000 women (In other countries with government health care that number is even lower), and the USA had an abortion rate of 20.8 abortions per 1000 women.
And suddenly I could see why that was the case. With Universal coverage, a mother pregnant unexpectedly would still have health care for her pregnancy and birth even if she was unemployed, had to quit her job, or lost her job. If she was informed that she had a special needs baby on the way, she could rest assured knowing in Canada her child’s health care needs would be covered. Whether your child needs therapy, medicines, a caregiver, a wheelchair, or repeated surgeries, it would be covered by the health care system. Here, you never heard of parents joining the army just so their child’s “pre-existing” health care needs could be covered. In fact, when a special needs person becomes an adult in Canada, they are eligible for a personal care assistant covered by the government. We saw far more developmentally or physically disabled persons out and about in Canada, than I ever see here in the USA. They would be getting their groceries at the store, doing their business at the bank, and even working job, all with their personal care assistant alongside them, encouraging them and helping them when they needed it. When my sister came up to visit, she even commented on how visible special needs people were when the lady smiling and waving while clearing tables at the Taco Bell with her caregiver clearly had Downs Syndrome.
I also discovered that the Canadian government looked out for its families in other ways. The country mandates one year of paid maternity leave, meaning a woman having a baby gets an entire year after the birth of her baby to recover and parent her new baby full-time, while still receiving 55% of her salary and her job back at the end of that year. Either parent can use the leave, so some split it, with one parent staying at home for 6 months and the other staying at home for 6 months. I could hardly believe my ears when I first heard it. In America, women routinely had to return to work after 6 weeks leave, many times unpaid. Many American women lost their jobs when becoming pregnant or having a baby. I knew people who had to go back to work 2 weeks after giving birth just to hang onto their job and continue making enough money to pay the bills. Also every child in Canada gets a monthly cash tax benefit. The wealthier families can put theirs into a savings account to pay for college someday (which also costs far less money in Canada by the way), the not so wealthy can use theirs to buy that car seat or even groceries. In the province we lived in, we also received a monthly day care supplement check for every child under school age. I made more money being a stay at home mom in Canada than I do in the States working a part-time close to a minimum wage job. And none of the things I listed here are considered “welfare” they are available to every Canadian regardless of income. For those with lower incomes than we had there are other supports in place as well.
If a woman gets pregnant unexpectedly in America, she has to worry about how she will get her own prenatal care, medical care for her child, whether or not she will be able to keep her job and how she will pay for daycare for her child so she can continue to support her family. In Canada those problems are eliminated or at least reduced. Where do you think a woman is more likely to feel supported in her decision to keep her baby, and therefore reduce abortions?
Since all of these benefits are available to everyone, I never heard Canadians talking about capping their incomes to remain lower income and not lose their government provided health coverage. Older people in Canada don’t have to clean out their assets to qualify for some Medicare or Social Security programs, I knew older people who went in for procedure after procedure, and we never heard about dwindling resources, kids paying for their parents medical expenses, or being forced to use up life insurance or funeral savings in order to get the health care they needed. I heard of inheritances being left even amongst the middle classes. Something I had only heard about in wealthy families in the USA.
And lest you think that the Canada system is draining the government resources, their budget is  very close to balanced every year. They’ve had these programs for decades. Last year Canada’s national debt was 586 billion dollars, the USA has 15.5 trillion dollars in national debt. Canada has about one 10th the population of the US, so even accounting for size, the USA is almost 3 times more indebted. And lest you think that taxes are astronomical, our median income taxes each year were only slightly higher than they had been in the States, and we still got a large chunk of it back each year at tax time.How will a divorce affect your health insurance coverage? During marriage, it’s common for one spouse to maintain health coverage for the entire family through his or her group health insurance plan at work. After a divorce, coverage for the other spouse and the children could terminate. State and federal laws offer protection to families in danger of losing health-care coverage, especially to children. But it’s important to re-examine your family’s health insurance situation before a divorce occurs to avoid serious complications afterward.
Health insurance coverage can be included in a divorce settlement

Because health coverage is such an important benefit, some divorce decrees stipulate that a spouse who provided health coverage for the other spouse or family during the marriage must continue to provide such coverage following a divorce. This is especially true if the other spouse didn’t work outside the home and has no immediate access to health insurance. Neither an insurer nor an employer can deny such court-ordered coverage when children are involved.

If you’re the spouse who carries the health coverage, you may have to pay additional premiums to continue coverage for your ex-spouse and your children, depending on the policy provisions. Some group policies will routinely allow you to continue full coverage for your family even after your divorce. Of course, this may change if you later remarry and want to include your new family on your policy. In any case, the premium for a group family plan may be less expensive than single coverage for two adults.
If your family has individual health insurance

If the issue of health insurance is not included in your divorce settlement, you’ll need to do some scrambling around if your ex-spouse is the insured on the family’s individual health insurance policy. It’s very possible that the coverage provided to you and your children could be terminated. Talk to your insurance agent to determine if you’re still covered, and for how long. If you’re still included in the policy, find out how much the premiums will be over the next 6 to 12 months. Also, begin looking into new health insurance for you and your children.
Secure health coverage for your children

Hopefully, you and your former spouse can work out an agreement regarding health coverage for your children. The child support section of the divorce agreement assigns responsibility for providing the children’s health insurance. But if the noncustodial parent or that parent’s insurance company or employer refuses to cooperate, federal law provides for a court order that secures your children’s continued health insurance coverage. This court order, known as a Qualified Medical Child Support Order (QMCSO), stipulates that custodial parents have the right to obtain health insurance coverage for their children through the noncustodial parent’s group health plan, if the noncustodial parent has such coverage. The children can’t be denied access to the plan, although limitations can be placed on the coverage. The order will not require the plan to provide additional benefits not actually offered in the plan.

The QMCSO can require that policy premiums be deducted directly out of the employee’s paycheck. Reimbursements for medical care are made directly to the custodial (nonemployee) parent, when that parent pays a provider. Also, the noncustodial parent can’t choose a medical plan that is unsuitable for the children. If you’re the custodial parent, get copies of your ex-spouse’s medical plan, medical claims and election forms, the summary plan description outlining your former spouse’s employee benefits, and the page designating the current insureds of the health plan.
Temporary coverage through your former spouse’s employer

Temporary protection may be available through the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). This federal law was designed to protect employees and their dependents at companies with 20 or more workers from losing group insurance coverage as a result of job loss or divorce.

If your former spouse maintained family health coverage through work, you may (at your own expense) continue this group coverage for up to 36 months after the divorce or legal separation. Your cost of continuing COBRA coverage can’t exceed 102 percent of the cost to the plan for providing identical benefits to an active participant. Be aware that you have the right to pay the premiums in monthly installments. Also, you must pay premiums on time or you’ll lose your coverage. COBRA coverage will terminate sooner than 36 months if you remarry or obtain coverage under another group health plan. Certain governmental plans and church-sponsored plans are exempt from the act.

Several states have enacted their own laws that preserve a spouse’s eligibility for health insurance after a separation or divorce. Some of these laws may provide you with rights more generous than those offered under COBRA, so check your state’s laws first. Ask your divorce attorney or contact your state insurance commissioner’s office.

Also, if you’re over a certain age, it may be wise to purchase individual health insurance or to make sure your working former spouse maintains health coverage as part of the divorce settlement. Otherwise, when COBRA coverage terminates after 36 months, you may find that poor health in your later years presents an insurability problem or that the cost of coverage is exorbitant. In addition, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 may provide certain protection regarding pre-existing conditions.

This material was prepared by Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc., and does not necessarily represent the views of John Jastremski, Jeremy Keating, Erik J Larsen, Frank Esposito, Patrick Ray, Robert Welsch, Michael Reese, Brent Wolf, Andy Starostecki and The Retirement Group or FSC Financial Corp. This information should not be construed as investment advice. Neither the named Representatives nor Broker/Dealer gives tax or legal advice. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If other expert assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. Please consult your Financial Advisor for further information or call 800-900-5867.

The Retirement Group is not affiliated with nor endorsed by fidelity.com, netbenefits.fidelity.com, hewitt.com, resources.hewitt.com,  access.att.com, ING Retirement, AT&T, Qwest, Chevron, Hughes, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, ExxonMobil, Glaxosmithkline, Merck, Pfizer, Verizon, Bank of America, Alcatel-Lucent or by your employer. We are an independent financial advisory group that specializes in transition planning and lump sum distribution. Please call our office at 800-900-5867 if you have additional questions or need help in the retirement planning process.
 
 



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...